Makueni Senator Accuses Raila Odinga of Ties to Adani Alleged Bribery Scandal
According to Maanzo, the Adani Group has allegedly been involved in Raila Odinga’s previous presidential campaigns, specifically in the 2012 election.
Makueni Senator Dan Maanzo.Photo/Citizen Digital.
By Robert Mutasi
Makueni Senator Dan Maanzo made explosive claims during a press briefing, accusing Kenyan political leaders of receiving significant bribes in exchange for favoring foreign companies in procurement deals.
In particular, he alleged that the Indian multinational, Adani Group, played a central role in influencing the political landscape by financing campaigns and securing major government contracts.
According to Maanzo, the Adani Group has allegedly been involved in Raila Odinga’s previous presidential campaigns, specifically in the 2012 election.
He further claimed that billions of shillings in bribes had been exchanged between political leaders, including both Raila and President William Ruto, in favor of Adani’s interests in Kenya.
Maanzo asserted that this corruption extended to the allocation of lucrative government projects, where the Adani Group was given preferential treatment over other bidders.
The Senator pointed out that the Indian company’s influence began when Raila was Prime Minister, suggesting that Raila’s continued support for Adani’s operations in Kenya was linked to financial backing during his campaigns.
The most recent controversy surrounds the proposed Public-Private Partnership (PPP) between Adani and the Kenyan government, which Raila has publicly endorsed.
Maanzo’s statements imply that this partnership is a product of corrupt dealings rather than transparent competition in procurement.
While Maanzo provided limited specifics on the scale of the bribes, he promised to reveal more details in Parliament.
He also implicated current Energy Cabinet Secretary Opiyo Wandayi as part of the deal, claiming his appointment was part of a broader scheme to protect the interests of the parties involved.
These allegations have sparked concerns about transparency in Kenya’s government dealings, especially given the large sums of money reportedly involved and the prominence of the political figures implicated.
The accusations come amid broader political tensions in the country, with public scrutiny mounting over government contracts and foreign influence.
As Maanzo indicated, the full scope of these claims may unfold in the coming parliamentary sessions.
About Author
