Wetangula Challenges Court Ruling on Parliamentary Majority
He argued that the judiciary is attempting to compel him to take actions that do not align with parliamentary procedures.
National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang'ula. Photo/Lolwe TV.
By Juliet Jerotich
National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetangula has defied a court ruling that declared the opposition as the majority in parliament, reaffirming that Kenya Kwanza holds the majority.
On February 12, 2025, Wetangula officially declared Kenya Kwanza as the majority party, contradicting the court’s decision, which favored the opposition’s claim.
In response, Wetangula has filed an application challenging the court proceedings against him regarding the determination of the parliamentary majority.
He argued that the judiciary is attempting to compel him to take actions that do not align with parliamentary procedures.
Furthermore, Wetangula maintained that no court order has explicitly required him to act or refrain from any action that could result in contempt proceedings.
His legal team insists that his role as Speaker grants him the authority to make such decisions independently.
Sandra Nganyi, representing the National Assembly, argued that the courts do not have the jurisdiction to hear or determine matters concerning parliamentary procedures.
She emphasized that the Speaker’s powers are protected under Article 117 of the Constitution, which grants the National Assembly autonomy in its internal operations.
In his application, Wetangula stated that he had not received any formal court orders before the initiation of the proceedings.
He further asserted that the decree must be properly served and justified before any legal action is taken against him.
The case is currently before Justices Jairus Ngaa, Lawrence Mugambi, and John Chigiti, who have directed all involved parties to appear in July for the submission hearings.
In his petition, Wetangula has requested the court to review its judgment and reconsider its ruling.
His legal team argues that the Speaker has the constitutional authority to determine parliamentary matters without judicial interference, making any proceedings against him unlawful.
About Author
