Uasin Gishu MCA Welcomes Court Order Halting Water Tariff Hike, Warns of Public Backlash Over Non-Compliance
He urged both the authorities and the public to exercise restraint, warning that confrontational approaches could worsen the situation and disrupt access to essential services.
Kimani Wanjohi, the Member of County Assembly (MCA) for Huruma Ward. Photo/Courtesy.
By Ruth Sang
A ward representative in Uasin Gishu County has welcomed court-issued conservatory orders suspending a controversial water tariff increase, even as he warned of possible public resistance if authorities fail to comply with the directive.
Huruma Ward MCA Kimani Wanjohi said a tribunal sitting in Nairobi had directed that the recently gazetted tariffs be reverted to previous rates pending the hearing and determination of an ongoing case.
He noted that the dispute over the tariff adjustments is currently before several legal forums, including the High Court and the Court of Appeal, with a key judgment expected next month.
“We will not allow due process to be violated. The tribunal has spoken, and its directive must be respected by all parties involved,” Wanjohi said.
The MCA accused a county-linked water service provider of ignoring existing court orders by proceeding with the tariff hike despite active legal challenges, describing the move as unlawful and irregular.
According to Wanjohi, contempt of court proceedings have already been initiated against senior officials of the utility for allegedly defying earlier High Court directives.
“They have to follow the law just as they expect wananchi to follow the law. We cannot have a situation where institutions act with impunity while residents bear the burden,” he said.
He called for the immediate implementation of the tribunal’s orders, particularly the reversal of the contested tariffs, citing the financial strain facing many households amid the rising cost of living.
In a strongly worded warning, the MCA signaled possible escalation if the directive is not honoured.
“If these court orders are not implemented, we will have no option but to advise residents accordingly. People cannot be forced to comply with незакон charges imposed in defiance of the law,” he said.
Wanjohi also raised concern over reports of possible water supply disruptions linked to the dispute, cautioning against punitive measures that could affect residents.
“We have heard threats of water disconnections. That would be unacceptable. Essential services should not be used as a tool to intimidate citizens,” he added.
He maintained that the matter should be resolved through legal channels, expressing confidence in the courts.
“We are going straight to judgment to seek a final resolution. We believe the courts will uphold fairness and protect the rights of residents,” he said.
Also weighing in, Abubakar Bini, Chairman of the Council of Imams and Preachers of Kenya North Rift chapter, called for calm and adherence to the rule of law.
“Court orders are not suggestions—they are binding. All parties must act within the law to avoid escalating tensions,” Bini said.
He urged both authorities and the public to exercise restraint, warning that confrontational approaches could disrupt access to essential services.
The leaders emphasized the need for accountability and transparency in the management of public utilities, noting that access to affordable and reliable water remains a key concern for residents across the North Rift.
As the legal battle unfolds, the dispute continues to draw attention from leaders, civil society, and the public, raising broader questions about governance, public participation, and the cost of essential services.
About Author
